Skip to main content

Microsoft vs Competition - Possible Alternative

[PLACEHOLDER]
Image



The latest development from Microsoft includes surface, Windows 8, Mobile endeavors and strategies, the cloud (Azure), the acquisition of Nokia.

Are they considering business services (enterprise offerings), as in providing wireless information services for the workplace? If not then… should they?

Microsoft continues on fighting for a “piece of the pie” for the consumer mobile market (tablets and phones), which currently is led by Apple iOS and Google Android devices, operating systems and app stores. It appears that new phone buyers are willing to give windows a try (at least outside of US and Canada, where the Nokia brand is not strong enough). But still I wonder if instead of going head to head with the 2 giants of the consumer mobile devices niche, Microsoft should consider an alternative strategy. Apple did this by making everyone fall in love again with the brand with their iPOD. That led to the iPhone and the rest is history.

The case that we want to focus here is that providing mobile solutions for the corporate market can be one of those alternatives for Microsoft. Most of the companies, at least in the Americas and Europe, are using PCs and windows operating system. A big population use Microsoft Office, then why not create the necessity for using their tablets and phones as well.  

Blackberry is currently struggling. For many years they were the leaders of wireless services (push emails, mobile phone, text messaging, internet faxing, Web browsing from your mobile phone, and other data related services). In addition, they were able to supply a solution for the niche, security (encryption built-in since day 1, the use of Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) among other corporate-features), and that worked very well for them. This made them popular within institutions (to mention an example: government), because, as we all can imagine when you are dealing with sensitive information traveling to your phone or through your corporate emails, just for naming a scenario, we can understand the value and the importance of having  our data as secure as possible. Blackberry devices became not only a part of our personal life, but part of our work/business one as well.

A few questions keep coming back to my mind: Will BB manage to maintain it? If they don’t then which company/provider will become the "go-to" vendor for this niche? Or will this niche go away as technology keeps changing?

Blackberry is going through a deal with FairFax Financial Holding Ltd. Making it a private company. If the deal moves forward but the wireless hand-held devices and services continues to lose ground facing the risk to become extinct (like others in the past, e.g. Palm) then who would be the one to rise to the challenge and the expectations?

Maybe this is a possible strategy for Microsoft to consider and finally position them as another viable and strong mobile option. I believe they (Microsoft) own strong tools (cloud, office, office365, outlook, server products, partners and infrastructure) that make them a viable option.

Microsoft needs to face the reality:
1. They did come out late in the game.
2. They haven’t been great in sales either.

So they need to make everyone feel they are an innovating company, but most of all they need to find a way to get to “everyone’s head and stay there” in a positive way.

I want to close this article by briefly referring to the other side of the coin around this subject.  There is a trend in the business market of “bring-your-own-device” policies where corporations ask employees to use their own mobile phones for work email and provide partial reimbursement to the employee, with the potential of converting the business and government market much more like the consumer market.

 Because of the security factor, I have my doubts this will happen completely. If any it will be a mix. Although the market behavior can always change and prove me wrong…

In any case if that trend becomes a reality then again the company with the most robust platform with a good service will be the one to lead that niche and gain more market share. If Microsoft intention is to dominate the mobile business then they should consider an alternative like this one before one of his competitors grabs it first.

Note: The article is based partially in public news.This Post is a collaborative work written by a group of individuals and provided to share on this blog. The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this post are purely from the author(s) and shared in this blog for sharing/discussion/knowledge purposes.

Trending posts

Goal setting frameworks for Product Management - OKR and HOSKR

Anonymous
As a business analyst and product manager we often use various frameworks to synthesize and organize our product ideas and goals. I think of frameworks as tools in our product management tool kit which we use depending on the task at hand.  And speaking of goals, OKR is a very popular framework that I often use to set the goals for the products I am managing. However recently I participated the #ProductCon conference hosted by Product School  and I stumbled upon one of the talks in which Rapha Cohen, the CPO at Google Waze introduced a more effective framework for setting product goals. The framework is called HOSKR.  In this post I'll describe both the OKR and HOSKR frameworks in more details using examples. I hope this will provide you, our readers, more practical insights on how to effectively use these frameworks to set your product goals.  OKR OKR stands for O bjectives and K ey R esults. If you are reading this post then you are on our Beolle blog and I am goi...
Read more

Digital Sovereignty in a Polarised World - Data, Cloud Power, and the Search for Trusted Alternatives

 Relationships have deteriorated, with trust diminished to an extent that may preclude restoration. The world, once structured to favour certain regions, has undergone significant shifts; for numerous countries, such advantages never existed. In this polarised reality, stakeholders are re-evaluating alliances, as former partners now often embody the role of "frenemy," thereby threatening freedom. This phenomenon is longstanding, rooted in historical power dynamics. When politics and influence supersede principles of fairness, respect, and integrity, ethical boundaries become blurred. Previously, issues that did not directly affect you would get overlooked out of principle, but current risks necessitate action to safeguard sovereignty. Information has consistently served as a key strategic asset, a trend only intensified by technological advancements that have elevated data as the principal factor. In other words, technology has amplified that, and data is the name of the game...
Read more

Assembling MLOps practice - part 2

 Part I of this series, published in May, discussed the definition of MLOps and outlined the requirements for implementing this practice within an organisation. It also addressed some of the roles necessary within the team to support MLOps. Lego Alike data assembly - Generated with Gemini   This time, we move forward by exploring part of the technical stack that could be an option for implementing MLOps.  Before proceeding, below is a CTA to the first part of the article for reference. Assembling an MLOps Practice - Part 1 ML components are key parts of the ecosystem, supporting the solutions provided to clients. As a result, DevOps and MLOps have become part of the "secret sauce" for success... Take me there Components of your MLOps stack. The MLOps stack optimises the machine learning life-cycle by fostering collaboration across teams, delivering continuous integration and depl...
Read more

AGILE For DIGITAL AGENCIES

Introduction Some Digital agencies have a project process where waterfalls still plays a big part of it, and as far as I can tell, the tech team is usually the one suffering as they are at the last part of the chain left with limited budget and time for execution. I do believe that adopting an Agile approach could make a Digital Agency better and faster. In this article I’m presenting you just another point of view of why it make sense looking at Agile Methodology.  Why Agile for a Digital Agency? The Agile movement started in the software development industry, but it has being proven to be useful in others as well. It becomes handy for the type of business that has changing priorities, changing requirements and flexible deliverables. In the Digital Agency of today you need a different mindset. Creative will always play a huge role (“the bread and butter”). But the “big guys” need to understand that without technology there is no Digital Agency. Technical resources ...
Read more

This blog uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. Simple analytics might be in place for pageviews purposes. They are harmless and never personally identify you.

Agreed