Skip to main content

Microsoft vs Competition - Possible Alternative


The latest development from Microsoft includes surface, Windows 8, Mobile endeavors and strategies, the cloud (Azure), the acquisition of Nokia.

Are they considering business services (enterprise offerings), as in providing wireless information services for the workplace? If not then… should they?

Microsoft continues on fighting for a “piece of the pie” for the consumer mobile market (tablets and phones), which currently is led by Apple iOS and Google Android devices, operating systems and app stores. It appears that new phone buyers are willing to give windows a try (at least outside of US and Canada, where the Nokia brand is not strong enough). But still I wonder if instead of going head to head with the 2 giants of the consumer mobile devices niche, Microsoft should consider an alternative strategy. Apple did this by making everyone fall in love again with the brand with their iPOD. That led to the iPhone and the rest is history.

The case that we want to focus here is that providing mobile solutions for the corporate market can be one of those alternatives for Microsoft. Most of the companies, at least in the Americas and Europe, are using PCs and windows operating system. A big population use Microsoft Office, then why not create the necessity for using their tablets and phones as well.  

Blackberry is currently struggling. For many years they were the leaders of wireless services (push emails, mobile phone, text messaging, internet faxing, Web browsing from your mobile phone, and other data related services). In addition, they were able to supply a solution for the niche, security (encryption built-in since day 1, the use of Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) among other corporate-features), and that worked very well for them. This made them popular within institutions (to mention an example: government), because, as we all can imagine when you are dealing with sensitive information traveling to your phone or through your corporate emails, just for naming a scenario, we can understand the value and the importance of having  our data as secure as possible. Blackberry devices became not only a part of our personal life, but part of our work/business one as well.

A few questions keep coming back to my mind: Will BB manage to maintain it? If they don’t then which company/provider will become the "go-to" vendor for this niche? Or will this niche go away as technology keeps changing?

Blackberry is going through a deal with FairFax Financial Holding Ltd. Making it a private company. If the deal moves forward but the wireless hand-held devices and services continues to lose ground facing the risk to become extinct (like others in the past, e.g. Palm) then who would be the one to rise to the challenge and the expectations?

Maybe this is a possible strategy for Microsoft to consider and finally position them as another viable and strong mobile option. I believe they (Microsoft) own strong tools (cloud, office, office365, outlook, server products, partners and infrastructure) that make them a viable option.

Microsoft needs to face the reality:
1. They did come out late in the game.
2. They haven’t been great in sales either.

So they need to make everyone feel they are an innovating company, but most of all they need to find a way to get to “everyone’s head and stay there” in a positive way.

I want to close this article by briefly referring to the other side of the coin around this subject.  There is a trend in the business market of “bring-your-own-device” policies where corporations ask employees to use their own mobile phones for work email and provide partial reimbursement to the employee, with the potential of converting the business and government market much more like the consumer market.

 Because of the security factor, I have my doubts this will happen completely. If any it will be a mix. Although the market behavior can always change and prove me wrong…

In any case if that trend becomes a reality then again the company with the most robust platform with a good service will be the one to lead that niche and gain more market share. If Microsoft intention is to dominate the mobile business then they should consider an alternative like this one before one of his competitors grabs it first.

Note: The article is based partially in public news.This Post is a collaborative work written by a group of individuals and provided to share on this blog. The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this post are purely from the author(s) and shared in this blog for sharing/discussion/knowledge purposes.

Trending posts


Introduction Some Digital agencies have a project process where waterfalls still plays a big part of it, and as far as I can tell, the tech team is usually the one suffering as they are at the last part of the chain left with limited budget and time for execution. I do believe that adopting an Agile approach could make a Digital Agency better and faster. In this article I’m presenting you just another point of view of why it make sense looking at Agile Methodology.  Why Agile for a Digital Agency? The Agile movement started in the software development industry, but it has being proven to be useful in others as well. It becomes handy for the type of business that has changing priorities, changing requirements and flexible deliverables. In the Digital Agency of today you need a different mindset. Creative will always play a huge role (“the bread and butter”). But the “big guys” need to understand that without technology there is no Digital Agency. Technical resources are

AI with great power comes responsibility

Generative AI continues to be front and centre of all topics. Companies continue to make an effort for making sense of the technology, investing in their teams, as well as vendors/providers in order to “crack” those use cases that will give them the advantage in this competitive market, and while we are still in this phase of the “AI revolution” where things are still getting sorted.   Photo by Google DeepMind on Unsplash I bet that Uncle Ben’s advise could go beyond Peter Parker, as many of us can make use of that wisdom due to the many things that are currently happening. AI would not be the exception when using this iconic phrase from one of the best comics out there. Uncle Ben and Peter Parker - Spiderman A short list of products out there in the space of generated AI: Text to image Dall.E-2 Fotor Midjourney NightCafe Adobe Firefly

Upcoming updates to Gmail and Yahoo Mail in Feb 2024

Gmail and Yahoo Mail recipients can comprise over 65-70% of an organization's email target lists. Hence, organizations must ensure they prepare for the upcoming requirements for Gmail and Yahoo Mail for senders. Recently, Google and Yahoo jointly announced they will implement stricter controls to ensure their users receive relevant emails and can unsubscribe effectively.  Photo by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash   In this article, we summarize these upcoming Gmail and Yahoo Mail requirements and provide resources for additional readings if you choose to explore further. Key date: According to Adobe, Google and Yahoo Mail will implement these requirements in Feb 2024.   There are three (3) essential requirements 1. Authenticate your email sending domain We wrote a detailed article on the three pillars of Email Authentication in Essence of email deliverability - SPF, DKIM, DMARC and segmentation . In summary, Google and Yahoo will require the sender domain to have proper authentications,

Demystifying OKR Scoring

You have probably read that one of the many good things about OKRs is that it provides structure and clarity to work towards common goals. It helps connect company, teams and individuals’ objectives to measurable results.   Photo by Garreth Brown via Pexels In a previous Beolle article, Herak wrote about HOSKR and OKRs. In this iteration we will focus on the OKR scoring. Measuring the “How” The KRs in OKRs are the Key Results. With them we measure the progress towards the Objectives we have set. So how do we score them in a way that makes sense, and measure the success? Few “gotchas” before we start Grades are an indication where you're going. In OKRs, scoring between .6 to .7 is your target. Scores between .8 and 1.0 are rare, meaning they are not the usual. If you find yourself completing all your OKRs within this range then something is not correct, for example, your Objectives are not Ambitious enough, meaning you always knew you (or your company or your team) were going to ach

This blog uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. Simple analytics might be in place for pageviews purposes. They are harmless and never personally identify you.