Skip to main content

Microsoft vs Competition - Possible Alternative

[PLACEHOLDER]



The latest development from Microsoft includes surface, Windows 8, Mobile endeavors and strategies, the cloud (Azure), the acquisition of Nokia.

Are they considering business services (enterprise offerings), as in providing wireless information services for the workplace? If not then… should they?

Microsoft continues on fighting for a “piece of the pie” for the consumer mobile market (tablets and phones), which currently is led by Apple iOS and Google Android devices, operating systems and app stores. It appears that new phone buyers are willing to give windows a try (at least outside of US and Canada, where the Nokia brand is not strong enough). But still I wonder if instead of going head to head with the 2 giants of the consumer mobile devices niche, Microsoft should consider an alternative strategy. Apple did this by making everyone fall in love again with the brand with their iPOD. That led to the iPhone and the rest is history.

The case that we want to focus here is that providing mobile solutions for the corporate market can be one of those alternatives for Microsoft. Most of the companies, at least in the Americas and Europe, are using PCs and windows operating system. A big population use Microsoft Office, then why not create the necessity for using their tablets and phones as well.  

Blackberry is currently struggling. For many years they were the leaders of wireless services (push emails, mobile phone, text messaging, internet faxing, Web browsing from your mobile phone, and other data related services). In addition, they were able to supply a solution for the niche, security (encryption built-in since day 1, the use of Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) among other corporate-features), and that worked very well for them. This made them popular within institutions (to mention an example: government), because, as we all can imagine when you are dealing with sensitive information traveling to your phone or through your corporate emails, just for naming a scenario, we can understand the value and the importance of having  our data as secure as possible. Blackberry devices became not only a part of our personal life, but part of our work/business one as well.

A few questions keep coming back to my mind: Will BB manage to maintain it? If they don’t then which company/provider will become the "go-to" vendor for this niche? Or will this niche go away as technology keeps changing?

Blackberry is going through a deal with FairFax Financial Holding Ltd. Making it a private company. If the deal moves forward but the wireless hand-held devices and services continues to lose ground facing the risk to become extinct (like others in the past, e.g. Palm) then who would be the one to rise to the challenge and the expectations?

Maybe this is a possible strategy for Microsoft to consider and finally position them as another viable and strong mobile option. I believe they (Microsoft) own strong tools (cloud, office, office365, outlook, server products, partners and infrastructure) that make them a viable option.

Microsoft needs to face the reality:
1. They did come out late in the game.
2. They haven’t been great in sales either.

So they need to make everyone feel they are an innovating company, but most of all they need to find a way to get to “everyone’s head and stay there” in a positive way.

I want to close this article by briefly referring to the other side of the coin around this subject.  There is a trend in the business market of “bring-your-own-device” policies where corporations ask employees to use their own mobile phones for work email and provide partial reimbursement to the employee, with the potential of converting the business and government market much more like the consumer market.

 Because of the security factor, I have my doubts this will happen completely. If any it will be a mix. Although the market behavior can always change and prove me wrong…

In any case if that trend becomes a reality then again the company with the most robust platform with a good service will be the one to lead that niche and gain more market share. If Microsoft intention is to dominate the mobile business then they should consider an alternative like this one before one of his competitors grabs it first.

Note: The article is based partially in public news.This Post is a collaborative work written by a group of individuals and provided to share on this blog. The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this post are purely from the author(s) and shared in this blog for sharing/discussion/knowledge purposes.

Trending posts

AI Agents is the new thing to talk about

Tech is evolving faster than ever in this AI era, that it feels every week there is something new to talk about, and what you learn weeks back is no longer relevant, or “that AI tools” already has gone through changes that you need to catch up with in order to stay relevant.  Fear not, embrace the challenges and learnings, and find applications for it that are good and ethical for this present, and the hereafter.  The new “craze” is AI agents, and for good reason!  Image generated with NightCafe In contrast with AI chatbots, an AI agent can execute tasks on your behalf. If you are thinking “ that this could be agents that we leave running independently for many days for a group of deliveries ”… Well then you are correct! Are there risks? Should we talk about trust and accountability? The answer for both is yes. I already hinted at it a couple of paragraphs above, when I wrote “ good and ethical ”. AI (Artificial Intelligence) agents are software that work autonomously,...

SLA-SLO-SLI and DevOps metrics

Companies are in need of the metrics that will allow them to stay in business by making sure they meet the expectations of their customers. The name of the game is higher customer satisfaction by winning their trust and loyalty. To do so, you want to provide good products and services. Therefore you need to find ways to monitor performance, drive continuous improvements and deliver the quality expected by the consumer in this highly competitive market. Photos from AlphaTradeZone via Pexel and Spacejoy via Unsplash SLAs, SLOs and SLIs are a good way to achieve the above. They allow clients and vendors to be on the same page when it comes to expected system performance. If we go one level deeper, vendors/providers work on NFRs (Non-Functional Requirements) when working on their solutions. NFRs define the quality attributes of a system. I bring them up because the relationship between them and the SLAs is that they provide, in a way, foundational aspects for the SLA-SLO-SL...

SRE, DevOps and ITOps

 If you are wondering what the differences between the SRE and DevOps are, as well as how these roles work with ITOps within an organisation then you are not alone; and best of all you are on the right blog post. Often enough business units in a company get confused, assigning the ServiceNow or Jira tickets or any other ticketing system of your preference, to the wrong group, and even having the incorrect expectations when doing resourcing. Let us go through definitions, insights and scenarios that will help you understand the difference. DevOps software development operations - AI Generated When it comes to DevOps and SRE, then you might be wondering which practice came first. While SRE may have originated a bit earlier, internally at Google, DevOps came first publicly as a practice and started to be used by companies. A few years later was when Google decided to open SRE to the world after the publication of the "Site Reliability Engineering" book. Therefore, technically sp...

The value of listening

 Have you ever been in a conversation that you feel at best is just a waste of time; at worst, that the other person does not care? Have you been the messenger in some of them, the recipient in another? We’ve all been there; at times with family, with friends, at work. When at work, has this ever happened to you in a group meeting, at a one-on-one; when giving or receiving feedback?   Photo by Christina Morillo via Pexels   I knew the type of manager I wanted to be from the start of my mentorship. As I continued to navigate the waters, it became increasingly clear that the path I had chosen was appropriate, and therefore, the type of future colleagues I wanted to be surrounded by, and the type of mentors I wanted to continue seeking guidance from.  For me, the path has always been of being a leader over a manager. I believe I can attribute that, first and foremost, to my family’s values and  principles, and the way my parents raised us. Secondly, my path in the ...

This blog uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. Simple analytics might be in place for pageviews purposes. They are harmless and never personally identify you.

Agreed