Skip to main content

Demystifying OKR Scoring

[PLACEHOLDER]
Image

You have probably read that one of the many good things about OKRs is that it provides structure and clarity to work towards common goals. It helps connect company, teams and individuals’ objectives to measurable results.

 

Photo by Garreth Brown via Pexels

In a previous Beolle article, Herak wrote about HOSKR and OKRs.

In this iteration we will focus on the OKR scoring.

Measuring the “How”

The KRs in OKRs are the Key Results. With them we measure the progress towards the Objectives we have set. So how do we score them in a way that makes sense, and measure the success?

Few “gotchas” before we start

  1. Grades are an indication where you're going.
  2. In OKRs, scoring between .6 to .7 is your target. Scores between .8 and 1.0 are rare, meaning they are not the usual. If you find yourself completing all your OKRs within this range then something is not correct, for example, your Objectives are not Ambitious enough, meaning you always knew you (or your company or your team) were going to achieve it without much effort.
  3. Low grading isn't to be punished.
  4. Scores matter less than the process. If you are taking too long during the scoring gathering, preventing you, or the team, from “doing”, then reconsider and correct the approach. 
  5. Company-wide scoring enforces the commitment.
  6. The scoring is a guide of what to keep doing, what to change, what not to keep doing. 
  7. The sweet spot for the amount of KRs within the same Objective is three (3). Having said that, you could have more, if you think that makes sense to your OKR.
  8. Focus on the results when scoring, meaning on fulfilling the outcome. Needs to be clear why you are giving that grade. Be ready to explain it. 
  9. Always welcome your team members’ opinions.
  10. Publicly grade organizational OKRs. 
pexels-berk-ozdemir-displayed-in-Beolle-Blog

How to score the OKRs?

  1. Have regular meetings to check how the OKRs are doing.
  2. Place the grading. Where 0 means no progress, and 1.0 means complete.
  3. Calculate a score for the objective, which is an average from the gradings. Tip: My personal preference is keeping it simple by avoiding different weights. Keeping an equal weight for all will simplify the use of the tool and the reporting. 
  4. Once calculated, the team needs to review the scoring together. Chat about challenges and blockers getting in the way to meet the Objectives. This allows them to identify the areas of improvement, determining if they stay course, or if there are opportunities to pivot. 
  5. Assign to work, teams and individuals to execute, and the cycle begins again.

There are a few ways to work on the scoring. I will stick with the traditional grading scale approach.

You want to review your OKRs frequently. With proper tools, you can log your process as close to real-time as possible. Tracking often will help with accuracy.  

In the traditional grading:

  1. You score your KRs in a scale of 0.1 to 1.0
  2. Leverage colours, representing rate of success.
    1. Green is from 0.7 to 1.0.  This is for a status of completed/delivered/DONE. 
    2. Yellow is from 0.4 to 0.6. This is for “progress has been made, but we felt short”
    3. Red is from 0 to 0.3. This is for “we have failed to make significant progress”

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0


Ideally, OKR scores fall between 0.6 to 0.7 (60 to 70 percent). If scoring below 0.6, your team is underperforming. If consistently scoring above 0.7 or completing 100 percent of the results, your goals might be insufficiently ambitious

- Photo by Andrea Piacquadio


As an example, let us say you want to determine the Monthly objective score from Obj1, that has 3 KRs.
Obj1 score = (KR1 + KR2 + …+ KRn-1 + KRn)/Amount of KRs


Excel - OKR example.



What about tools?

Here are some examples:

Microsoft Excel Sheet

SmartSheets have good templates set for OKRs.

Trello. Leveraging cards and the waterfall chart.

Hive.

Note from the author

As a SAFe certified, and a person that enjoys the Scaled Agile Framework, it is always great to revisit the SAFe material that presents the Strategic Themes that connects the enterprise strategy to the portfolio vision. In there you will also find the relationship between Value Stream KPIs and the Strategic Themes.
Why this is relevant to the topic in this article is because the two (2) frameworks are linked together, complimenting each other, as OKRs are directly or indirectly related to the KPIs (See the image below).
If you want to read about this connection, then follow the value stream kpis link.  

Value stream KPIs are derived from strategic themes and local concerns


Trending posts

Apple's App Tracking Transparency sealing Meta's fate

Anonymous
If you have been following the recent news on Meta (formerly Facebook) you may have read that Meta recently projected their ad revenue will be cut by a staggering $10 billion in 2022 due to Apple’s new App Tracking Transparency feature (also known as ATT). This has resulted in Meta’s stock to plummet by over 20%. Photo by julien Tromeur on Unsplash - modified by Beolle So what is Apple’s ATT and how does it impact ad revenue? Apple has been releasing multiple privacy features for the last few years. This included Apple’s Mail Privacy Protection and Apple’s App Tracking Transparency feature. You can learn more about Apple’s Mail Privacy Protection in our earlier post by clicking here .  Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) was launched in iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5 where it prompted users to select if they wanted the app to track their activities across other apps on the device. The prompt is displayed when the user opens an app like Facebook or Instagram for the first time o...
Read more

Reimagining Digital Experience Management: How Agentic AI is Transforming Adobe Experience Manager

 Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) has introduced powerful new Agentic AI capabilities designed to continuously improve and adapt digital experiences at the speed of AI. By integrating advanced AI orchestrators through Agent-to-Agent (A2A) and Model Control Protocol (MCP) tools, AEM enables brands to automate complex workflows and enforce compliance seamlessly across enterprise ecosystems. Through a suite of specialized agents, teams can transition from manual, weeks-long processes into fast, AI-assisted workflows powered by simple natural language prompts. Photo by Tunahan KALAYCI via Pexels   Here is a breakdown of the key agents driving AEM’s new Agentic capabilities, their value propositions, their guardrails, and their current availability status. 1. Brand Experience Agent. Overview. The Brand Experience Agent accelerates digital modernization through specialized sub-agents—the Experience Modernization Agent, Experience Production Agent, and Experience Development Agent. Tog...
Read more

Designing Habit Forming Mobile Application

Anonymous
Mobile Applications have become an integral part of our daily lives - we use mobile apps as alarm clocks to wake us up in the morning, to create to do lists when we start our day, to communicate with our colleagues at work via apps like Skype. We even check reviews of restaurants to visit on apps like Yelp and we seek entertainment on apps like Netflix and spotify. So what drives us to use these apps so seamlessly in our daily lives? Why we prefer some apps over others? Is there a science behind designing successful mobile apps like Facebook?  Photo by Peter C from Pexels A study in US revealed that a user between the age of 18 and 44 visits the Facebook app on average 14 times a day [1]. This shows that using the Facebook app is a daily routine for many of its users. This makes Facebook a great example of a habit forming mobile app which is designed with human psychology in mind that encourages habit forming behavior in its users .   I recently attended a seminar ...
Read more

Steer for a talent transformation strategy (and avoiding AI fatigue)

 There was a debate on whether to feature the term “AI” in the title of this article. Honestly, a key motivation for pursuing the research that led to this post was sparked by the widespread excitement about AI appearing constantly in our LinkedIn feed, to the point of feeling the fatigue, and even a bit disappointed in the algorithm of this, and the others, social media and content curated apps.  We soon discovered that there is an entire concept called "AI fatigue", not exactly how we were feeling it, but more about the mixed emotions people in the workforce have regarding the use of AI tools. Photo by Mart Production via Pexels (background updated with AI and Adobe  tech) From micro blog posts to video podcasts, lately, most of the tech content we encounter revolves around AI. They often sound or read very similar, usually mentioning the same few top providers. The articles (and social posts... at least the popular ones with paid-campaigns behind it) tend to focus less...
Read more

This blog uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. Simple analytics might be in place for pageviews purposes. They are harmless and never personally identify you.

Agreed