Skip to main content

Assembling MLOps practice - part 2

[PLACEHOLDER]

 Part I of this series, published in May, discussed the definition of MLOps and outlined the requirements for implementing this practice within an organisation. It also addressed some of the roles necessary within the team to support MLOps.

lego-alike-data-assemblyLine-green
Lego Alike data assembly - Generated with Gemini

 

This time, we move forward by exploring part of the technical stack that could be an option for implementing MLOps. 

Before proceeding, below is a CTA to the first part of the article for reference.


Lego-Alike-data-assembly

Assembling an MLOps Practice - Part 1

ML components are key parts of the ecosystem, supporting the solutions provided to clients. As a result, DevOps and MLOps have become part of the "secret sauce" for success...


Components of your MLOps stack.

The MLOps stack optimises the machine learning life-cycle by fostering collaboration across teams, delivering continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD), modular code structures, and automated workflows. This approach accelerates time-to-market while enhancing model reliability. 

Components.

  • Version control.
    • Allowing collaboration as the teams contribute to the ML code.
    • Essential to the CI/CD pipeline and the automation. 
    • E.g. Github, bitbucket, others.
  • Model pipeline.
    • For model environments and libraries, you can leverage tools such as Tensorflow, Azure Machine Learning Studio, Pytorch, Cohere, others.
    • For CI/CD and automation you leverage Jenkins, Github Actions, Apache Airflow, Luigi, Prefect
    • For deployments and monitoring your model performance on the cloud you have options like Azure ML, AWS Sagemaker, Google Vertex, Databricks, MLFlow.
  • Containerisation for your models. The usual suspects here: Docker, K8s (Kubernetes) with AKS (Azure) or EKS (AWS) or GKE (Google cloud).

Approach for monitoring ML pipeline.


You want to watch for certain things within the lifetime of your ML pipeline:

  • Model drift. When the model is not performing because of changes in the data, leading to inaccuracy predictions. 
  • Data drift. A change to the input data to the model over time. If so, then you can start to notice the declining performance of the model. 
  • Performance
  • Fatigue due to overwhelming alerting/notifications. 

To tackle the challenges above then leverage an ML framework and tools that allow for:

  • Proactive monitoring.
  • Automated remediation.
  • Continuous improvement. 

Here is a list of tools:

  • Pytorch.
  • Tensorflow.
  • MLflow.
  • AWS Sagemaker.
  • Azure ML.  

MLFlow and demo.

We are going to focus on MLflow because (at least at the time of writing this article) is one of the best options for MLOps activities, due to its versatility and ease of learning.  It includes robust features for:

  1. Experiment Tracking.
  2. Model Management.
  3. Deployment.
  4. It is open-source.
  5. A great community behind it, with regular updates.

An additional advantage of this tool is its flexibility, which enables seamless integration with various other tools that users may prefer. Combined, these tools create a robust MLOps toolkit and provide an effective framework for project implementation. Below you will find a couple of suggestions:

  •  MLflow and AWS Sagemaker. MLflow can be focused on tracking and deployment. SageMaker deals with scalable infrastructure for model training.
  • MLflow and Prometheus and Grafana. This is one of the most popular combinations that you will find on the internet these days. MLflow focuses on tracking, workflows and deployments. Prometheus can capture the metrics and perform real-time monitoring around the ML models, which can be leveraged for diagnostics (performance, health, etc.). Grafana complements all these with its visualization of the data provided via Prometheus.
endless-library-robot-librarian-with-people

Recommended article

Democratising AI. Democratising AI is all about empowering others to use it, by making it available to them...


 Learnings from setting MLflow on AWS.

Tech used:

  • MLflow,
  • Docker,
  •  Microsoft VSCode as IDE,
  • Github Copilot with Gemini 2.5 Pro model,
  • Terraform,
  • PostgreSQL as the DB Engine,
  • Amazon AWS:
    • ECS,
    • ECR,
    • Secret Manager,
    • IAM (for user, role and policy),
    • EC2 (load balancer),
    • Aurora and RDS,
    • CloudWatch.

Prerequisites.

Install the AWS CLI.  

  • Instructions: aws cli userguide - getting started 
  • Once you install the CLI then get your Access-key-ID and Secret-access-key.
  • Use this command to configure the CLI: aws configure
  • Check your work by making sure you are running the right version and the configure is correct. Handy commands:
    • Aws --version
    • Aws configure list

Install Terraform. 

At the end of our internal lab practice we ended up with a functional MLflow instance on AWS. See image and code repo link below. 

 Note: Important to call out this was a lab exercise for the purposes of this article. In order to have this production ready, additional steps are require, which will include security checks and multiple test rounds. 

 

MLflow running on Beolle - AWS instance

Key takeaways.

  1. Whether you are new to Terraform or quite experienced, when using GitHub Copilot as a coding assistant, don’t simply accept its code without question. It’s important to evaluate the quality, security, and ensure the logic remains consistent. This final point is crucial because the assistant offers a range of possible code flows, which might diverge and affect the overall design of your code and the services you’ve chosen to implement.
  2.  LLMs are good code assistants. It was helpful to get this done. However, do not fall under the trap of letting it do everything. Take time to learn and understand what you are producing. Also keep in mind that for production readiness you need to follow your quality and security controls. 
  3. One important lesson was that all the necessary privileges were needed for Terraform to run and set up the required AWS services. Keep this in mind and enjoy the process; have some fun!

Public Github repo.

 Note before you go to the repo: Like we mentioned in the takeaways section, we had to tweak the AWS role and policy created for this so Terraform could run smoothly and the IaC would work right.
 
 If you check out the repo, especially the main.tf file, you'll see our comment pointing out that the role and policy are pretty basic and missing some recent updates needed for everything to run without a hitch. We didn’t want to hold up publishing this article any longer, so we decided to go ahead with it.  

We plan to update the repo soon. Meanwhile, feel free to ask a friend who knows AWS and Terraform for help, or use your favourite LLM to assist you with that part. Good luck!

beol-mlops-mlflow lab

 

Trending posts

Reimagining Digital Experience Management: How Agentic AI is Transforming Adobe Experience Manager

 Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) has introduced powerful new Agentic AI capabilities designed to continuously improve and adapt digital experiences at the speed of AI. By integrating advanced AI orchestrators through Agent-to-Agent (A2A) and Model Control Protocol (MCP) tools, AEM enables brands to automate complex workflows and enforce compliance seamlessly across enterprise ecosystems. Through a suite of specialized agents, teams can transition from manual, weeks-long processes into fast, AI-assisted workflows powered by simple natural language prompts. Photo by Tunahan KALAYCI via Pexels   Here is a breakdown of the key agents driving AEM’s new Agentic capabilities, their value propositions, their guardrails, and their current availability status. 1. Brand Experience Agent. Overview. The Brand Experience Agent accelerates digital modernization through specialized sub-agents—the Experience Modernization Agent, Experience Production Agent, and Experience Development Agent. Tog...

Steer for a talent transformation strategy (and avoiding AI fatigue)

 There was a debate on whether to feature the term “AI” in the title of this article. Honestly, a key motivation for pursuing the research that led to this post was sparked by the widespread excitement about AI appearing constantly in our LinkedIn feed, to the point of feeling the fatigue, and even a bit disappointed in the algorithm of this, and the others, social media and content curated apps.  We soon discovered that there is an entire concept called "AI fatigue", not exactly how we were feeling it, but more about the mixed emotions people in the workforce have regarding the use of AI tools. Photo by Mart Production via Pexels (background updated with AI and Adobe  tech) From micro blog posts to video podcasts, lately, most of the tech content we encounter revolves around AI. They often sound or read very similar, usually mentioning the same few top providers. The articles (and social posts... at least the popular ones with paid-campaigns behind it) tend to focus less...

Designing Habit Forming Mobile Application

Mobile Applications have become an integral part of our daily lives - we use mobile apps as alarm clocks to wake us up in the morning, to create to do lists when we start our day, to communicate with our colleagues at work via apps like Skype. We even check reviews of restaurants to visit on apps like Yelp and we seek entertainment on apps like Netflix and spotify. So what drives us to use these apps so seamlessly in our daily lives? Why we prefer some apps over others? Is there a science behind designing successful mobile apps like Facebook?  Photo by Peter C from Pexels A study in US revealed that a user between the age of 18 and 44 visits the Facebook app on average 14 times a day [1]. This shows that using the Facebook app is a daily routine for many of its users. This makes Facebook a great example of a habit forming mobile app which is designed with human psychology in mind that encourages habit forming behavior in its users .   I recently attended a seminar ...

Building MCP with TypeScript

MCP servers are popular these days. We’ve been researching and exploring a few code repos, some where missing modularity, others just not having pieces that we were looking for… therefore we decided to build our own, simple and foundational that could be a starting point for those trying to solve for the similar things we were… and we decided to share it with the community, via our public github. MCP host, server,data sources     Before we start.  Using Typescript and NodeJS was one of our requirements. This proved somewhat challenging because I don't code as frequently these days due to my leadership responsibilities, and I typically prefer working with C# or Python. Colleagues in my tech community have been working with their teams on some of their MCPs going the Python route. Therefore, I said, “I guess we are trying the other route” 😊. One of our reasons to go with TypeScript was due to the need of the integration with APIs, and based on the research, it seems t...

This blog uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. Simple analytics might be in place for pageviews purposes. They are harmless and never personally identify you.

Agreed